Salient Features of the Constitution
Salient features of the Indian Constitution for CGPSC: written and lengthy, rigid-flexible, federal with unitary bias, parliamentary system, basic structure.
Prerequisites
- The Preamble — the features below are how the Preamble’s ideals are built into the machinery of the State.
- Constitutional Development (1773–1950) — many features (federal scheme, governors, public service commissions) were inherited from the Government of India Act, 1935.
The Hook: The Commission That Set This Exam
The body that sets your exam, the Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission (छत्तीसगढ़ लोक सेवा आयोग), is not a government department. It is created by Article 315 of the Constitution, its members can be removed only through a procedure the Constitution itself lays down, and its expenses are charged on the Consolidated Fund of the State.
Why would a Constitution bother to protect a recruitment body? Because one of its salient features is a set of independent bodies that keep elections, accounts and public appointments out of day-to-day political control. That feature sits beside a dozen others: a federal system with a strong Centre, a parliamentary government, an integrated judiciary, Fundamental Rights and Duties, and a Constitution that is both rigid and flexible.
What makes the Indian Constitution distinctive, and how do these features fit together?
Why it matters: Prelims tests exact details: the number of parts and schedules, which amendment did what, and which features are “federal” and which are “unitary”. Mains asks you to explain one feature in depth: “federal with a unitary bias”, “rigid or flexible”, “parliamentary sovereignty versus judicial supremacy”.
The Constitution in Numbers
| Item | Original (26 Jan 1950) | Today (as of 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Articles | 395 | The numbering still ends at 395, but inserted articles (21A, 243A, 279A…) raise the total. Textbooks usually quote about 470; some sources give a lower figure because they count differently |
| Parts | 22 | 25 (Part VII repealed in 1956; Parts IVA, IXA, IXB and XIVA added) |
| Schedules | 8 | 12 |
| Amendments | — | 106 (the latest enacted is the 106th Amendment, 2023, on women’s reservation) |
The four schedules added after 1950:
| Schedule | Added by | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| Ninth | 1st Amendment, 1951 | Laws protected from challenge (originally land reform laws) |
| Tenth | 52nd Amendment, 1985 | Anti-defection law |
| Eleventh | 73rd Amendment, 1992 | 29 subjects for Panchayats |
| Twelfth | 74th Amendment, 1992 | 18 subjects for Municipalities |
The Salient Features
1. The lengthiest written constitution
India has the longest written constitution of any sovereign country. Reasons:
- Geographical size and diversity, which needed special provisions for particular states and regions (Arts 371 to 371J, the Fifth and Sixth Schedules).
- Single constitution for the Union and the States (except Jammu and Kashmir until 2019).
- Influence of the Government of India Act, 1935, which was itself very long and detailed.
- The dominance of legal experts in the Constituent Assembly.
- It covers not only the basic principles but also administrative detail (for example, on the public service commissions and the Comptroller and Auditor General).
2. Drawn from various sources
The framers borrowed from the Government of India Act, 1935 and from many foreign constitutions, then adapted these to Indian conditions. See Sources of the Constitution.
3. A blend of rigidity and flexibility
Article 368 provides for amendment. There are, in practice, three ways the Constitution changes:
| Method | Majority needed | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Simple majority of Parliament (these are not “amendments under Art 368”) | Ordinary majority, as for any law | Creation of new states or changes in their boundaries (Arts 2, 3, 4); citizenship; quorum in Parliament; creation or abolition of Legislative Councils (Art 169) |
| Special majority of Parliament (Art 368) | Majority of the total membership of each House and two-thirds of members present and voting | Most provisions, including Fundamental Rights and DPSP |
| Special majority + ratification by half the States (Art 368(2) proviso) | As above, plus ratification by the legislatures of at least half the States by simple majority | Federal provisions: election of the President, distribution of legislative powers, the Seventh Schedule, representation of States in Parliament, the Supreme Court and High Courts, Art 368 itself |
So the Constitution is neither as rigid as the US Constitution nor as flexible as the British (which has no written constitution at all).
4. Federal system with a unitary bias
Article 1 calls India a “Union of States”, not a “federation”. Ambedkar explained that the Indian federation was not the result of an agreement among states, and that no state has the right to secede from it. The phrase “an indestructible Union of destructible States” is often used to sum this up.
| Federal features | Unitary (non-federal) features |
|---|---|
| Two sets of government: Union and State | A strong Centre: the Union List is longest and residuary powers lie with the Centre (Art 248) |
| Division of powers in the Seventh Schedule: Union, State and Concurrent Lists | Single constitution for Union and States |
| Written constitution | Single citizenship |
| Supremacy of the Constitution | Parliament can change state boundaries and names by simple majority (Art 3) |
| Rigid for federal provisions (state ratification) | Integrated judiciary with the Supreme Court at the top |
| Independent judiciary to settle Centre–State disputes | All-India Services (IAS, IPS, IFoS) under Art 312 |
| Bicameralism: the Rajya Sabha represents the States | Governor appointed by the President |
| Emergency provisions that convert the federation into a near-unitary system | |
| Parliament can legislate on State List subjects in some cases (Arts 249, 250, 252, 253) | |
| Unequal representation of States in the Rajya Sabha; integrated election machinery; single CAG |
- K.C. Wheare: “quasi-federal”.
- Ivor Jennings: “a federation with a strong centralising tendency”.
- Granville Austin: “cooperative federalism”.
- Morris-Jones: “bargaining federalism”.
Use one or two of these in a Mains answer. Do not use all four.
The Supreme Court has held that federalism is a basic feature of the Constitution (S.R. Bommai, 1994).
5. Parliamentary form of government
Borrowed from the British (Westminster) system and adopted at both the Centre and in the States.
- Nominal head (President / Governor) and real executive (Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister / Chief Minister). Art 74(1) binds the President to act on ministerial advice.
- Collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers to the Lok Sabha (Art 75(3)) and to the Legislative Assembly in the States (Art 164(2)).
- Ministers are drawn from the legislature. Majority party rule. Leadership of the PM or CM.
- Dissolution of the Lower House on the advice of the PM or CM.
It is chosen over the presidential system for responsibility (the executive answers to the legislature every day) over stability (a fixed term).
6. Synthesis of parliamentary sovereignty and judicial supremacy
| British model | American model | Indian synthesis |
|---|---|---|
| Parliamentary sovereignty: courts cannot strike down an Act of Parliament | Judicial supremacy: wide power of judicial review | Parliament can amend the Constitution (Art 368), but courts can strike down laws (Arts 13, 32, 226) and test amendments against the basic structure |
The scope of judicial review in India is narrower than in the US, partly because the Constitution uses “procedure established by law” (Art 21) rather than “due process of law” (although Maneka Gandhi, 1978, brought in a test of fair, just and reasonable procedure).
7. Integrated and independent judiciary
- Single integrated system: the Supreme Court at the top, High Courts below it, then subordinate courts. The same system enforces both Central and State laws, unlike the dual courts of the US.
- Independence secured by: security of tenure, removal only by a special procedure, salaries charged on the Consolidated Fund, a bar on practice after retirement in some courts, and the power to punish for contempt.
- For Chhattisgarh: the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur was set up on the formation of the state on 1 November 2000.
8. Fundamental Rights
Part III (Arts 12–35) guarantees six categories of rights, justiciable but not absolute. They promote political democracy and limit the State. Details: Fundamental Rights.
9. Directive Principles of State Policy
Part IV (Arts 36–51), borrowed from the Irish Constitution, are non-justiciable but “fundamental in the governance of the country” (Art 37). They aim at social and economic democracy and a welfare State. In Minerva Mills (1980), the Court held that the Constitution is founded on a balance between Fundamental Rights and the DPSP.
10. Fundamental Duties
Part IVA, Article 51A was added by the 42nd Amendment (1976) on the recommendation of the Swaran Singh Committee. There were originally 10 duties. The 86th Amendment (2002) added the 11th, the duty of parents and guardians to provide opportunities for education to their children aged 6–14. Duties are non-justiciable. See Directive Principles and Fundamental Duties.
11. A secular State
There is no State religion. All religions get equal respect and protection.
- The word “secular” was added to the Preamble in 1976, but the idea was already in Arts 14, 15, 16, 25–28, 29 and 30.
- Indian secularism is positive: the State may regulate the secular activities linked to religion and undertake social reform (for example, temple entry laws), unlike the strict separation of the US.
12. Universal adult franchise
- Article 326: every citizen who is not otherwise disqualified has the right to vote, without discrimination of caste, religion, sex, literacy or wealth.
- The voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 by the 61st Amendment Act, 1988.
- Granting the vote to all adults from the very first election (1951–52) in a largely non-literate country was a bold choice.
13. Single citizenship
India has one citizenship (Arts 5–11), as in Britain, even though it has a federal structure. The US, by contrast, has dual (national and state) citizenship.
14. Independent bodies
| Body | Article |
|---|---|
| Election Commission of India | 324 |
| Comptroller and Auditor General | 148 |
| Union Public Service Commission | 315 |
| State Public Service Commissions (CGPSC for us) | 315 |
| Finance Commission | 280 |
15. Emergency provisions
| Type | Article | Ground |
|---|---|---|
| National Emergency | 352 | War, external aggression or armed rebellion (“internal disturbance” replaced by the 44th Amendment, 1978) |
| State Emergency / President’s Rule | 356 | Failure of the constitutional machinery in a State; also Art 365 (failure to comply with Union directions) |
| Financial Emergency | 360 | Threat to the financial stability or credit of India (never proclaimed so far) |
16. Three-tier government
The original Constitution had two tiers: Union and State. The 73rd (Panchayats, Part IX) and 74th (Municipalities, Part IXA) Amendments of 1992 added a third tier of local government. See Local Government: 73rd and 74th Amendments and, for this state, Panchayati Raj in Chhattisgarh.
17. Co-operative societies
The 97th Amendment (2011) gave co-operative societies constitutional status: forming co-operatives became a right under Art 19(1)(c), a new DPSP Art 43B was added, and Part IXB (Arts 243ZH–243ZT) was inserted.
The Basic Structure Doctrine
The most important “feature” was not written by the framers. It was developed by the Supreme Court.
graph LR
A["Shankari Prasad (1951)
Parliament can amend
Fundamental Rights"] --> B["Golaknath (1967)
Parliament CANNOT amend
Fundamental Rights"]
B --> C["24th Amendment (1971)
Restores amending power"]
C --> D["Kesavananda Bharati (1973)
Can amend any part,
but not the basic structure"]
D --> E["Minerva Mills (1980)
Limited amending power
is itself basic structure"]Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) — a 13-judge bench, decided 7:6 — held that Parliament’s power under Art 368 is wide but cannot be used to destroy the basic structure of the Constitution. The Court did not give a closed list. Elements recognised in this and later cases include:
- Supremacy of the Constitution
- Sovereign, democratic and republican character
- Secularism and federalism (S.R. Bommai, 1994)
- Separation of powers
- Judicial review and independence of the judiciary
- Rule of law
- Free and fair elections (Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain, 1975)
- Limited amending power and the balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP (Minerva Mills, 1980)
- Parliamentary system of government
- Welfare State
Analysis for Mains: Criticisms and Defence
| Criticism | Response |
|---|---|
| “A borrowed constitution” — a “bag of borrowings” | The framers adapted what they borrowed to Indian conditions. Ambedkar argued that, this late in history, the basic ideas of a constitution were common knowledge |
| “A carbon copy of the 1935 Act” | The administrative frame was taken over, but the 1935 Act had no Fundamental Rights, no responsible government at the Centre, no universal franchise and no sovereignty |
| “Un-Indian” — no roots in Gandhian village tradition | Panchayats were placed in the DPSP (Art 40) and became constitutional bodies in 1992 |
| “Elephantine size” | The length reflects diversity, special provisions for regions and tribes, and the wish to leave little to convention in a new democracy |
| “A lawyers’ paradise” (Ivor Jennings) | Precision was needed to protect rights and divide powers in a federal system |
| “Federal in form, unitary in spirit” | The strong Centre was a response to Partition and the integration of princely states. Cooperative federalism (GST Council, Finance Commission) has grown since |
Chhattisgarh angle: Several salient features meet in this state. Art 3 allowed Parliament to create Chhattisgarh by an ordinary law (the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000) — a unitary feature that served a regional aspiration. The Fifth Schedule governs the state’s large Scheduled Areas. Art 315 creates the CGPSC, and Art 214 gives the state its own High Court at Bilaspur.
Memory Tricks
Don’t Confuse
| This | vs | That |
|---|---|---|
| Art 1: “Union of States” | vs | “Federation” (the word is not used in the Constitution) |
| Simple-majority changes (Arts 2, 3, 4, 169) — not amendments under Art 368 | vs | Special majority under Art 368 |
| Special majority: majority of total membership + 2/3 of present and voting | vs | State ratification: at least half the States, by simple majority |
| Golaknath (1967) — cannot amend Fundamental Rights | vs | Kesavananda (1973) — can amend, but not the basic structure |
| 61st Amendment (1988) — voting age 18 | vs | 86th Amendment (2002) — Art 21A and the 11th Fundamental Duty |
| 42nd Amendment (1976) — Fundamental Duties (10) | vs | 86th Amendment (2002) — 11th Duty |
| Art 352 — “armed rebellion” (after 1978) | vs | Pre-1978 text — “internal disturbance” |
Common Mistakes
- “The Constitution describes India as a federation.” False. Art 1 says “Union of States”.
- “All amendments need ratification by half the States.” Only those affecting federal provisions do.
- “Creation of a new state requires a constitutional amendment under Art 368.” False. It is done by an ordinary law under Arts 2–4 (as for Chhattisgarh in 2000).
- “India has dual citizenship like the US.” False. Single citizenship.
- “The Twelfth Schedule lists Panchayat subjects.” False. Panchayats are in the Eleventh (29 subjects); Municipalities in the Twelfth (18).
- “The basic structure is listed in the Constitution.” False. It is a judicial doctrine (Kesavananda, 1973), with no closed list.
- “Financial Emergency has been imposed once.” False. It has never been proclaimed.
Practice
All questions below are original practice questions written in CGPSC style. They are not previous-year questions.
Level 1: Foundation
- At its commencement the Constitution had ______ articles, ______ parts and ______ schedules.
- The voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 years by the ______ Amendment Act of ______.
- Article 1 of the Constitution describes India as a “______ of States”.
Answers
- 395 articles, 22 parts, 8 schedules.
- 61st Amendment Act, 1988.
- “Union of States”.
Level 2: Prelims MCQs
Q1. Which of the following are unitary (non-federal) features of the Indian Constitution?
- Appointment of the Governor by the President
- Division of powers through the Seventh Schedule
- All-India Services
- Single citizenship
Select the correct answer using the code below:
- (a) 1 and 2 only
- (b) 1, 3 and 4 only
- (c) 2, 3 and 4 only
- (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
Answer and explanation
Q2. Consider the following statements:
- Parliament can create a new State by a law passed by a simple majority, without an amendment under Article 368.
- An amendment to the Seventh Schedule requires ratification by the legislatures of at least half of the States.
- Fundamental Rights can be amended only with ratification by half of the States.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 1 and 2 only
- (c) 2 and 3 only
- (d) 1, 2 and 3
Answer and explanation
Q3. Match List I (Schedule) with List II (Subject):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| A. Ninth Schedule | 1. Anti-defection |
| B. Tenth Schedule | 2. Powers of Municipalities |
| C. Eleventh Schedule | 3. Validation of certain Acts and Regulations |
| D. Twelfth Schedule | 4. Powers of Panchayats |
- (a) A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4
- (b) A-1, B-3, C-4, D-2
- (c) A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2
- (d) A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2
Answer and explanation
Q4. The “basic structure” doctrine was first laid down by the Supreme Court in:
- (a) Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967)
- (b) Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
- (c) Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980)
- (d) S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)
Answer and explanation
Q5. Which of the following bodies is not established directly by the Constitution of India?
- (a) Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission
- (b) Comptroller and Auditor General of India
- (c) Finance Commission
- (d) NITI Aayog
Answer and explanation
Level 3: Mains Answer Writing
Q1. (60 words) Why is the Indian Constitution described as “a blend of rigidity and flexibility”?
Model answer outline
- Intro: Art 368 provides graded methods of amendment.
- Flexible: many provisions change by simple majority (Arts 2–4, 169, citizenship). Most provisions need only a special majority of Parliament.
- Rigid: federal provisions also need ratification by half the States. The basic structure doctrine (1973) sets an outer limit.
- Conclusion: neither as rigid as the US nor as flexible as Britain: 106 amendments (as of 2026) without losing its core.
Q2. (150–200 words) “The Indian Constitution is federal in form but unitary in spirit.” Critically examine.
Model answer outline
- Intro: Art 1 calls India a “Union of States”. Wheare called it “quasi-federal”.
- Federal in form: two levels of government; Seventh Schedule; written and supreme Constitution; State ratification for federal amendments; independent judiciary; Rajya Sabha.
- Unitary in spirit: strong Centre and residuary powers (Art 248); Art 3; Governor appointed by the Centre; All-India Services; emergency provisions (Arts 352, 356); Arts 249, 252, 253; single citizenship and integrated judiciary.
- Counterpoints: federalism is a basic feature (S.R. Bommai, 1994), which curbed misuse of Art 356. Finance Commission transfers, the GST Council (Art 279A) and the 73rd/74th Amendments show cooperative federalism.
- Chhattisgarh angle: Art 3 made the state possible in 2000 through an ordinary law, a central power used to meet a regional demand.
- Conclusion: A “federation with a strong centralising tendency” (Jennings), designed for unity after Partition, which has grown more cooperative in practice.
Quick Revision Table
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Original size | 395 articles, 22 parts, 8 schedules |
| Today (as of 2026) | About 470 articles (textbook count), 25 parts, 12 schedules, 106 amendments |
| Schedules added | 9th (1st, 1951), 10th (52nd, 1985), 11th (73rd, 1992), 12th (74th, 1992) |
| Amendment | Art 368: special majority; + half the States for federal provisions |
| Simple majority changes | Arts 2, 3, 4, 169, citizenship and others |
| Art 1 | “Union of States” |
| Quasi-federal | K.C. Wheare |
| Parliamentary system | Arts 74, 75 (Centre); 163, 164 (States) |
| Fundamental Duties | 42nd (1976), 10 duties; 11th added by 86th (2002) |
| Voting age 18 | 61st Amendment, 1988; Art 326 |
| Emergencies | 352 (national), 356 (State), 360 (financial, never used) |
| Co-operatives | 97th Amendment, 2011; Part IXB, Art 43B |
| Basic structure | Kesavananda Bharati, 1973 (13 judges, 7:6) |
| CG High Court | Bilaspur, 1 November 2000 |
Key Takeaways
- The world’s lengthiest written constitution: 395/22/8 in 1950; about 470/25/12 and 106 amendments as of 2026.
- Rigid and flexible: simple majority, special majority, or special majority with State ratification.
- Federal with a unitary bias: “Union of States”; strong Centre, Governor, All-India Services, emergencies.
- Parliamentary government plus a synthesis of parliamentary sovereignty and judicial supremacy.
- The basic structure doctrine (Kesavananda, 1973) is the judicial check on the amending power.
What’s Next
- Sources of the Constitution — where each of these features came from
- Centre-State Relations — the federal balance in detail
- Parliament — how the parliamentary system works
- Judiciary — judicial review and the integrated court system
- Formation of the State and Administrative Structure — Art 3 in action for Chhattisgarh