Society, Community and Institution
Society, community, association and institution with MacIver, Cooley, Sumner, Tönnies and Durkheim, illustrated with Indian and Chhattisgarh examples for CGPSC Mains.
Prerequisites
- None in sociology: this is the first page of the chapter. Read the chapter overview for the map.
- Tribal Social Organisation and the Ghotul: clan, marriage and village council facts that this page uses as examples
- Local Government in Chhattisgarh: the Gram Sabha and panchayat, which appear here as a modern community institution
The Hook: One Village, Four Words
Picture a village near Kondagaon. Its people share a place, a weekly haat, a sacred grove and a strong sense of “we”. The young people meet in the Ghotul. Every family follows the same rules of clan and marriage. A women’s self-help group in the village runs a small enterprise, and a co-operative society buys its paddy. Twice a year everyone gathers in the Gram Sabha (ग्राम सभा).
Which of these is a community, which is an association, which is an institution, and what is the “society” that holds them all? Sociology uses these four words precisely, and Mains answers lose marks when they are used loosely.
Why it matters: GS-IV regularly asks for definitions and distinctions (“Distinguish between community and association”, “What is a social institution?”). A good answer names the sociologist, gives the distinguishing features and adds an Indian example.
Society (समाज)
Definitions to quote
| Sociologist | Definition |
|---|---|
| R. M. MacIver and C. H. Page, Society: An Introductory Analysis (1949) | Society is “a system of usages and procedures, of authority and mutual aid, of many groupings and divisions, of controls of human behaviour and of liberties”. In short, “society is a web of social relationships, and it is always changing” |
| Talcott Parsons | Society is the total complex of human relationships arising out of action in terms of means–end relationships (paraphrase) |
The key idea: society is not a crowd of people but the pattern of relationships among them. Relationships require mutual awareness: two strangers on a bus are not in a social relationship; a passenger and a conductor are.
Characteristics of society
- Likeness (shared needs, values and a sense of belonging) and difference (division of labour, roles). MacIver stressed that society needs both.
- Interdependence: families depend on markets, villages on the state.
- Co-operation and conflict both exist; conflict is also a social relationship.
- Abstract: you cannot see “society”, only people acting within relationships.
- Dynamic: it changes continuously.
- Culture: every society transmits a way of life (see Culture).
Community (समुदाय)
Definition and bases
MacIver and Page: a community is “an area of social living marked by some degree of social coherence”. Its two bases are:
- Locality: a defined territory, such as a village, a town, a tribal settlement.
- Community sentiment: a sense of belonging, which MacIver and Page break into we-feeling, role-feeling (each person knows their place and duties) and dependency-feeling (each depends on the community for physical and psychological needs).
A community is not deliberately created; it grows. Members share a whole common life, not one interest. Examples: a village, a tribe, a town, a diaspora that keeps a strong sense of shared identity.
Chhattisgarh illustration
A Muria or Gond village of Bastar is a community in the textbook sense: a defined territory, clans that know their duties to each other, a village priest and headman, common deities, collective labour at sowing and harvest, and shared festivals such as the Madai (मड़ई). The everyday Indian use of “community” for a caste or religious group (“the Satnami community”) is looser; in an answer, say that it is used in the sense of a group with strong community sentiment, even if not confined to one locality.
Association (संघ / समिति)
MacIver and Page: an association is “an organisation deliberately formed for the collective pursuit of some interest, or set of interests, which its members share”.
| Feature | Association |
|---|---|
| Origin | Deliberately created for a purpose |
| Membership | Voluntary (mostly) and partial: you join for one interest |
| Rules | Formal rules, office-bearers, often written constitution |
| Duration | May be temporary; dissolves when the purpose ends |
| Examples | Political party, trade union, a self-help group, a primary agricultural co-operative society, a cricket club, a university |
Community vs association
| Basis | Community | Association |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | Spontaneous, grows naturally | Deliberately formed |
| Purpose | Whole common life | Specific interest(s) |
| Locality | Essential | Not essential |
| Sentiment | Strong we-feeling | Weaker; based on shared interest |
| Membership | Usually by birth or residence | By choice; one can belong to many |
| Example in a CG village | The village itself | The women’s SHG, the paddy co-operative, the Ghotul’s organised work-teams are closer to association |
Institution (संस्था)
Definitions to quote
| Sociologist | Definition |
|---|---|
| MacIver and Page | Institutions are “established forms or conditions of procedure characteristic of group activity” |
| W. G. Sumner, Folkways (1906) | An institution “consists of a concept (idea, notion, doctrine, interest) and a structure” (the apparatus or set of functionaries that carries out the concept) |
| Kingsley Davis | A set of interwoven folkways, mores and laws built around one or more functions |
An institution is a set of rules and procedures, not a group of people. MacIver’s famous line: “We belong to associations, but not to institutions.”
Association vs institution
| Association (a group) | Institution (a procedure) |
|---|---|
| Family (as a group of people) | Marriage, the rules of inheritance |
| University | Examination system, degree |
| Political party | Election, the party system |
| The State | Government, law |
| Church, temple trust, panth | Worship, rituals, sacraments |
| A Gram Panchayat (the elected body) | The Gram Sabha meeting as a procedure, panchayat justice |
The major social institutions
| Institution | Function | Indian / Chhattisgarh illustration |
|---|---|---|
| Family (परिवार) | Reproduction, care, socialisation, property | Joint family in the rice plains; nuclearisation in Raipur–Bhilai–Durg and among migrant workers |
| Marriage (विवाह) | Regulates sex, legitimises children, links families | Tribal forms such as lamsena (service) and gurawat (exchange); bride price among most tribes |
| Kinship (नातेदारी) | Defines who is related and how; descent and inheritance | Clan exogamy and tribal endogamy; Chhattisgarh’s ritual friendships (mitan, mahaprasad, gangajal, bhojali) create fictive kinship that lasts for life |
| Caste (जाति) | Ranks groups by birth; regulated occupation and marriage | Endogamous castes; reform movements of Guru Ghasidas (Satnam Panth) and the Ramnami Samaj challenged caste exclusion |
| Religion (धर्म) | Meaning, morality, solidarity | Village deities, devgudi (Bastar), Danteshwari, Kabirpanth |
| Economy (अर्थव्यवस्था) | Production and exchange | Weekly haat; the jajmani system, in which service castes were paid in grain (described for north India by W. H. Wiser, The Hindu Jajmani System, 1936) |
| Polity (राजनीति) | Authority, order, dispute settlement | Traditional village councils; Gram Sabha (Art 243A) and PESA Gram Sabhas in Scheduled Areas |
| Education (शिक्षा) | Transmits knowledge and values | School, ashram-schools, and in Muria villages the Ghotul as a traditional educational institution |
Characteristics of institutions
- Social origin and permanence: they outlive individuals.
- Norm-bound: built of folkways, mores and laws.
- Purpose: each meets a basic social need.
- Symbols and structure: a wedding ring or mangalsutra, a flag, a courtroom.
- Interrelated: a change in the economy (wage work in Korba or Bhilai) changes the family (nuclearisation) and marriage (later age at marriage).
- Resistant to change, but not unchanging.
Kinds of Groups
Primary and secondary groups
Charles Horton Cooley, Social Organization (1909), defined primary groups as those “characterised by intimate face-to-face association and co-operation”. He called them the “nursery of human nature” and gave three examples: the family, the play-group of children and the neighbourhood or community group of elders.
| Basis | Primary group | Secondary group |
|---|---|---|
| Size | Small | Large |
| Contact | Face-to-face, intimate | Indirect, formal |
| Relationship | An end in itself; whole person | A means to an end; partial (one role) |
| Control | Informal (gossip, affection) | Formal (rules, law) |
| Examples | Family, close friends, a Ghotul peer group, a Bhojali friendship | Trade union, political party, a government office, a large co-operative |
In-group and out-group
W. G. Sumner, Folkways (1906): the in-group is “we” (loyalty, co-operation), the out-group is “they” (indifference or hostility). The same person can be in-group in one context and out-group in another: a fellow Chhattisgarhi in Delhi becomes “one of us”.
Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft
Ferdinand Tönnies, Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft (1887):
| Gemeinschaft (community) | Gesellschaft (society / association) |
|---|---|
| Based on natural will (Wesenwille): sentiment, tradition | Based on rational will (Kürwille): calculation, contract |
| Kinship, neighbourhood, friendship | Market, city, company, bureaucracy |
| Example: a tribal village in Bastar | Example: Nava Raipur’s offices and industrial Bhilai |
Mechanical and organic solidarity
Émile Durkheim, The Division of Labour in Society (1893):
| Mechanical solidarity | Organic solidarity |
|---|---|
| Solidarity of likeness: similar work, beliefs and lifestyle | Solidarity of interdependence created by the division of labour |
| Strong collective conscience | Weaker collective conscience; more individualism |
| Repressive law (punishment) | Restitutive law (restore the situation: contract, compensation) |
| Simple, pre-industrial societies | Complex, industrial societies |
| Example: a forest village where every family farms and collects forest produce | Example: a Bhilai township where the steel worker depends on the teacher, the doctor and the trader |
flowchart LR
A["Society
web of relationships"] --> B["Community
locality + sentiment"]
A --> C["Association
deliberate, specific purpose"]
B --> D["Institutions
rules and procedures"]
C --> D
D --> E["Family, marriage, kinship,
caste, religion, economy,
polity, education"]Analysis for Mains: The Indian Village as a Community
- The “little republic” view: Sir Charles Metcalfe (1830) described Indian village communities as “little republics”, self-sufficient and unchanging.
- The correction: village studies after Independence (for example S. C. Dube, Indian Village, 1955; M. N. Srinivas’s work on Rampura) showed villages were linked to wider caste, market, pilgrimage and political networks, and were internally unequal.
- Chhattisgarh today: the tribal village keeps strong community sentiment and customary institutions, now recognised in law through PESA (1996) and the Chhattisgarh PESA Rules (2022). The plains village is more stratified by caste and land, and more tied to markets, the PDS and paddy procurement.
- Change: migration for work, roads and mobile phones, and urbanisation move many relationships from Gemeinschaft towards Gesellschaft, from mechanical towards organic solidarity. Associations (SHGs, co-operatives, farmer producer organisations) increasingly do what kinship once did.
Memory Tricks
Don’t Confuse
| This | vs | That |
|---|---|---|
| Community: spontaneous, whole life, locality | vs | Association: deliberate, specific interest |
| Association: a group you belong to (party) | vs | Institution: a procedure (election) |
| Primary group (Cooley, 1909) | vs | In-group (Sumner, 1906) — a primary group is about intimacy; an in-group is about “we vs they” |
| Gemeinschaft / Gesellschaft (Tönnies, 1887) | vs | Mechanical / organic solidarity (Durkheim, 1893) |
| Repressive law (mechanical) | vs | Restitutive law (organic) |
Common Mistakes
Practice
All questions below are original practice questions written in CGPSC style. They are not previous-year questions.
Level 1: Foundation
- The two bases of a community according to MacIver and Page are ______ and ______.
- Who called the primary group the “nursery of human nature”?
- Durkheim associated ______ law with mechanical solidarity and ______ law with organic solidarity.
Answers
- Locality and community sentiment.
- Charles Horton Cooley (Social Organization, 1909).
- Repressive law; restitutive law.
Level 2: Prelims-style MCQs
Q1. Consider the following statements:
- According to MacIver, an association is deliberately formed for the pursuit of specific interests.
- MacIver held that people are members of institutions in the same way as they are members of associations.
- A community requires a definite locality.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 1 and 3 only
- (c) 2 and 3 only
- (d) 1, 2 and 3
Answer and explanation
Q2. Match List I (Concept) with List II (Thinker):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| A. Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft | 1. W. G. Sumner |
| B. Primary group | 2. Émile Durkheim |
| C. In-group and out-group | 3. Ferdinand Tönnies |
| D. Organic solidarity | 4. C. H. Cooley |
- (a) A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2
- (b) A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3
- (c) A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2
- (d) A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
Answer and explanation
Q3. Which one of the following is an institution rather than an association?
- (a) A women’s self-help group in Dhamtari
- (b) A primary agricultural co-operative society
- (c) Marriage
- (d) A political party
Answer and explanation
Q4. In Durkheim’s scheme, a society held together mainly by the similarity of its members’ work and beliefs, with a strong collective conscience and repressive law, shows:
- (a) Organic solidarity
- (b) Mechanical solidarity
- (c) Gesellschaft
- (d) Anomie
Answer and explanation
Q5. Which of the following is not among the three examples of primary groups given by Cooley?
- (a) The family
- (b) The play-group of children
- (c) The trade union
- (d) The neighbourhood or community group of elders
Answer and explanation
Level 3: Mains Answer Writing
Q1. (60 words) Distinguish between community and association with one example of each from Chhattisgarh.
Model answer outline
- Definitions: Community: “an area of social living marked by some degree of social coherence” (MacIver and Page), based on locality and community sentiment. Association: a group deliberately formed to pursue specific shared interests.
- Differences: spontaneous vs deliberate; whole common life vs specific purpose; locality essential vs not essential; membership by birth or residence vs by choice.
- Examples: a Muria village of Kondagaon (community); a women’s self-help group or a paddy co-operative society in the same village (association).
- Conclusion: associations usually exist within communities.
Q2. (150–200 words) “Social institutions are interrelated: change in one changes the others.” Explain with reference to family and economy in Chhattisgarh.
Model answer outline
- Intro: Define institution (MacIver and Page: established forms of procedure; Sumner: concept + structure). Institutions form a system.
- Body:
- Economy changes: industrial and mining towns (Bhilai, Korba, Raigarh), migration for wage work, cash crops and market linkages.
- Family changes: joint to nuclear households in towns; women’s paid work and SHG income; later age at marriage with schooling.
- Marriage and kinship: bride price and service marriage decline where cash incomes rise; kin networks still used for migration and jobs.
- Polity and education: 50% reservation for women in panchayats (since 2008) and schooling change gender roles inside the family.
- Religion and culture: festivals adapt (Bhojali friendships, Madai) but continue as markers of identity.
- Chhattisgarh angle: tribal villages show slower change because customary institutions are protected by PESA; the plains and industrial belt show faster change.
- Conclusion: Institutions adjust to each other; policy that changes one (say, land or labour) should anticipate effects on the family and community.
Quick Revision Table
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Society | Web of social relationships (MacIver and Page, 1949) |
| Community | Locality + community sentiment (we-feeling, role-feeling, dependency-feeling) |
| Association | Deliberately formed for specific shared interests |
| Institution | Established forms of procedure (MacIver and Page); concept + structure (Sumner) |
| MacIver’s line | “We belong to associations, but not to institutions” |
| Primary group | Cooley, Social Organization (1909); family, play-group, neighbourhood; “nursery of human nature” |
| In-group / out-group | Sumner, Folkways (1906) |
| Gemeinschaft / Gesellschaft | Tönnies (1887); natural will vs rational will |
| Mechanical / organic solidarity | Durkheim (1893); repressive vs restitutive law |
| Jajmani system | W. H. Wiser (1936) |
| Village as “little republics” | Charles Metcalfe (1830); critiqued by later village studies |
Key Takeaways
- Society is a web of relationships; a community adds locality and sentiment; an association is created for a purpose; an institution is a procedure.
- MacIver’s test: you belong to associations, not to institutions.
- Learn the four classic pairs with names and years: primary group (Cooley 1909), in-group (Sumner 1906), Gemeinschaft (Tönnies 1887), solidarity (Durkheim 1893).
- Indian villages are communities, but not isolated “little republics”; they are stratified and linked to the wider world.
- In Chhattisgarh, the tribal village, ritual friendship (mitan) and the Gram Sabha are strong illustrations for Mains answers.
What’s Next
- Socialisation: how these groups and institutions make an individual into a member of society
- Status and Role: the positions people hold inside groups
- Social Aspects of Chhattisgarh: caste, tribe and family in the state
- Western Thinkers: Durkheim and others in more depth